World's most popular travel blog for travel bloggers.

Don't understand one step for AVL tree height log n proof

, , No Comments
Problem Detail: 

I came across a proof that the an AVL tree has O(log n) height and there's one step which I do not understand.

Let $N_h$ represent minimum number of nodes that can form an AVL tree of height h. Since we're looking for minimum number of nodes, let its children's minimum number of nodes be $N_{h-1}$ and $N_{h-2}$.

Proof:

$$N_h = N_{h-1} + N_{h-2} + 1 \tag{1}$$ $$N_{h-1} = N_{h-2} + N_{h-3} + 1 \tag{2}$$ $$ N_h = (N_{h-2} + N_{h-3} + 1 + ) + N_{h-2} + 1 \tag{3}$$ $$ N_h > 2N_{h-2} \tag{4}$$ $$N_h > 2^{h/2} \tag{5} $$

I do not understand how we went from (4) to (5). If anyone could explain, that'd be great. Thanks!

Asked By : user2635911

Answered By : jonaprieto

You can continue as same as line 4 the process like that:

$$ N_h > 2N_{h-2}> 2(2 N_{h-4})>2(2(2 N_{h-6}))>\cdots$$ As you can see, the indexs are decreasing by substracting $2$ in each step when you use the inequality. So, the process stops when the index $h$ takes $0$, but from the indexs behavior the half of $h$ (floor) will be the quantity of times that we substract $2$ from $h$.

$$ N_h > 2N_{h-2}>\cdots>2(2(2(2(2h^{h-10}))))> 2^{\frac{h}{2}}$$

Best Answer from StackOverflow

Question Source : http://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/27899

0 comments:

Post a Comment

Let us know your responses and feedback