I've been working on this graph and just completely botching it. I mean to say that my solution may be the worst possible other than if a monkey had thrown darts at the graph to decide the next path. Anyhow, I'm lost and really trying to get a grasp of where my conclusion and the proper conclusion diverged dramatically.
I wanted to perform a DFS, show discovery/finish times, the DF forest, and edge classifications. I assumed that: 1) The vertices are listed in alphabetical order in each adjacency list. 2) The vertices are taken in the alphabetical order in the main loop of the DFS algorithm.
Should I be treating this as a directed acyclic graph?
Asked By : stackuser
Answered By : Pål GD
$L$ has an edge to $K$, other than that, the DFS forest you've drawn is correct. And since $K$ would not be expanded before $L$, there should be an edge $LK$ in the BFS forest.
Best Answer from StackOverflow
Question Source : http://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/12728
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know your responses and feedback