I have a hard time to understand why the concatenation of two languages over an alphabet (concatenation is in NP), doesn't imply that each of the languages for themselves are in NP. I talked with my Prof about the problem today, but I can't wrap my head around it. Can you help me out?
Asked By : but_they_should
Answered By : David Richerby
Take the concatenation of $\Sigma^*$ with any language that contains the empty word but is known not to be in NP (for example, an undecidable language).
Best Answer from StackOverflow
Question Source : http://cs.stackexchange.com/questions/33034
0 comments:
Post a Comment
Let us know your responses and feedback